Instruction match
Reviewers check whether the proof matches the specific task instructions, including the requested action, proof format, and task context.
Public rules
Understand how Task Reward reviews proof submissions: what reviewers check, what can lead to rejection, and why approved rewards are separated from raw submissions.
Reviewers check whether the proof matches the specific task instructions, including the requested action, proof format, and task context.
Submissions must fit the allowed proof window. Late submissions or missing resubmission windows can affect whether a task remains eligible for review.
Screenshots and links need to be readable and usable. Broken links, incomplete screenshots, or unclear evidence can fail review.
Task Reward uses review logic and anti-abuse checks to look for duplicate patterns, suspicious proof reuse, or other signals that weaken trust in a submission.
Approved proof moves the reward forward. Rejected proof does not credit the reward, and some cases may allow a resubmission depending on the task and review state.