Task Reward.

Public rules

Task Reward proof review policy

Understand how Task Reward reviews proof submissions: what reviewers check, what can lead to rejection, and why approved rewards are separated from raw submissions.

Instruction match

Reviewers check whether the proof matches the specific task instructions, including the requested action, proof format, and task context.

Timing and deadline

Submissions must fit the allowed proof window. Late submissions or missing resubmission windows can affect whether a task remains eligible for review.

Image and link quality

Screenshots and links need to be readable and usable. Broken links, incomplete screenshots, or unclear evidence can fail review.

Consistency and anti-abuse signals

Task Reward uses review logic and anti-abuse checks to look for duplicate patterns, suspicious proof reuse, or other signals that weaken trust in a submission.

Decision outcome

Approved proof moves the reward forward. Rejected proof does not credit the reward, and some cases may allow a resubmission depending on the task and review state.

Common reasons proof gets rejected

  • The screenshot does not show the required action or completion state.
  • The submitted link is missing, broken, private, or unrelated to the task.
  • The proof arrives outside the allowed window.
  • The proof appears duplicated, manipulated, or inconsistent with the account activity.
  • The submission does not meet the exact task instructions even if some work was attempted.

Ready to submit real proof inside the app?

The public policy explains how review works. Sign in or create an account to claim tasks and submit proof in the member workspace.